From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 244A23858C52; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 17:14:40 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 244A23858C52 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1712250880; bh=gTTTNvgt/bj0QEtGGsB17zNS/F56IFZ4P5LR5VOzdCU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=uaGJqmwVzO2Qi7bVebESNJQ2g+lumUAW9mCE4Z8WY3GbWCppR1Du8aSdPGyoQXyfr fJ7t+yC20vX9wwv0/3huiQOCz9XOhZZyd2FqgyhUNzq0TO1P4UBbbYFSJJEjPrCYdd wh8PbjZGEAh2LaRSWwD51Qoh9DSheC3DyYbxhuzg= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/114566] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Misaligned vmovaps when compiling with stack-protector-strong for znver4 Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 17:14:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114566 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14) > Marking for 14 as well because I believe the trunk commit just made it > latent there rather than fixed. You might be able to reproduce it on the trunk with -fno-vect-cost-model because the patch which made it latent was to the cost model.=