From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2B9AD3858D38; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:07:36 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2B9AD3858D38
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1712941656;
	bh=8qvHry7StSOM17LKaoMRIXBLAXtwEg3KlP8bX4S52iE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=dlbe7edrvkUAWun0RfLKJknRFjjXNOC+d2OmFVNnBJkAwJ2GU5lqIcfii5QjbfdBE
	 vu4tVzkWSl7VQQ0br2KZQp+7ozw1jGu8qhsYahcKMmYk2xS8q3a/uvcPMgpfLny+2c
	 T1ptk3PV9+RFeh8JqT+/a8XV10StL9YewC6geIc0=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/114574] [14 regression] ICE when building curl with LTO
 (fld_incomplete_type_of, at ipa-free-lang-data.cc:257) since r14-9763
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:07:35 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: lto
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114574-4-mZF6NQcDTu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114574-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114574

--- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to uecker from comment #26)
> Note that not updating the types seems wrong also pre C23. PR114493 could=
 be
> an example of this:
>=20
> typedef struct a a;
> int c;
> int f(a **);
> struct __attribute__((__may_alias__)) a {};

That should be the same type, not different, no?=