From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id CD1643849ACE; Fri,  3 May 2024 08:26:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CD1643849ACE
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714724767;
	bh=rY7JaYRVtRP+mFk9CZeuIOoXapcUWRoChvcO3dKDO+s=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=YctvWqzZKqN01e7nvUclD01KPpGbroUjXIPkWw1BlXUez0cYl9qVxxkIC+9nX2ycg
	 Mc30bNhke3pFMpg6mwa30LMEJP6sQEYBh7C84KVdxMsuBRLKQLTumflNHdbvJs4zB2
	 k9WMFoRWtfYQIGx690hSVPC15RM65A3uxm/v0xI8=
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug go/114582] go.test/test/fixedbugs/issue34123.go FAILs
Date: Fri, 03 May 2024 08:26:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: go
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ian at airs dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-114582-4-s65r2Bu6vs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114582-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114582-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114582

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.o=
rg
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-05-03
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW

--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Rather weird, given that there is apparently no FP in the code.  The (kludg=
y)
way out could be to exclude the inexact flag from the test, as I don't think
that people really care about exceptions on inexact results in practice.=