From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 025F33858C56; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 13:38:44 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 025F33858C56 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1712929125; bh=IDCicf8T+tczfU8+lPP/COcXDH3AkFUR1KEWgc2Ipwc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cIS/nckjFbRhdZFYAunXj3pyOvbuI0t3NwX/GdCS6NrnR4KRBygGrIcraIxbd4OAR qMlzBX29NHRn0KkEPtiKhmZKBUWJ3a+iJht3ZMIWq2wOCGbO43rkttSzzZV0cB1KSI hPaUPuh48cdKVXQqnc16LziauNRRn4XeDRy5jKPk= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/114621] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2812 (unrecognizable insn) with -O -fpie and _Thread_local with large offset Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 13:38:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: priority Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114621 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|P1 |P2 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- A 13 years old ICE on an obscure testcase isn't P1, nobody is using hundred= s of megabytes of TLS data, typically one uses hundreds of bytes at most, these problems are only when one needs more than 2GB of TLS data.=