From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0608A3858289; Mon,  8 Apr 2024 12:26:00 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0608A3858289
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1712579161;
	bh=DEgeYhZ0NyFyjcaiJMxgEFb/zPD+iOxF3R64my8g9vE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Rg3ffc/5icAJRo75hh9eXBgE9+szmdecZ68I/og3w24Kqm/Cc5XfCMA45WEKciA+R
	 0H6sh3/bd43ctGabQNXd0HOIxptVDuHwEjKCfYevsQCcvN7ljmt7p1f2oidEtm2aqV
	 Vl7QYusxHly87EDAadeo3ry26qks5OTRmiaIcniY=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114635] OpenMP reductions fail dependency
 analysis
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 12:26:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, openmp
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-114635-4-hqsd6aAnOW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114635-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114635-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114635

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
As for the dependence analysis itself - the issue is that the D.5606[_33]
style accesses have no access functions - I'm not sure how they evolve,
but I see their domain is even [0, POLY_INT_CST [15, 16] ].  I guess
we don't expect to have dependence analysis handle this but do dependence
fully within 'safelen' here.=