From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DC0CF3858CDA; Mon,  8 Apr 2024 21:50:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DC0CF3858CDA
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1712613044;
	bh=NgVhAk9ZXg9x4fGyFsZnwHnMZYh6B49zcNLtYNl/mZs=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=OkKqVovzfarsXUA/xWFcktWa8xPPtZwa0YruJ/hmPILDTim4opvbDJeHhlwxGeB1U
	 1XpzxMWuHtja2dkD+xih5LKcs0i7/aPBNN6XHMmUIBT8Tk+P3oHH3GNTHx2ui0Titt
	 CMDwmTTQhOijxYSqeOZJjHroKNmEnNetg9HqHeZ8=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/114646] libgfortran still doesn't define
 GTHREAD_USE_WEAK to 0 for newer glibc
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2024 21:50:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-114646-4-50MnvpJYii@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114646-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114646-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114646

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Bruno Haible from comment #11)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> > Dup.
> >=20
> > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 87189 ***
>=20
> This makes no sense to me:
> - I verified that https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D87189 is
> fixed; therefore it ought to be marked as RESOLVED FIXED.
> - Whereas H.J. is seeing this bug here with GCC 13 and glibc 2.38.
> Therefore they cannot be duplicates of each other.

Yes it is all the same issue.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 78017 ***=