public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/114674] [aarch64] ldp_fusion fails to merge 2 strs due to imprecise alignment info Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 13:27:04 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-114674-4-g3oFy6sJOU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-114674-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114674 Alex Coplan <acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2024-04-10 --- Comment #3 from Alex Coplan <acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Confirmed. I think it might be best to take the maximum MEM_ALIGN between the adjusted mem (new_mem) and the original mem (change_mem). In this case it happens that the original mem (change_mem) has a stronger alignment guarantee, but in general it could be the case that the adjusted mem gives a better alignment guarantee. Since both locations are known to point to the same address, it seems best to me to take the largest alignment of the two.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-10 13:27 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-04-10 7:41 [Bug rtl-optimization/114674] New: " dizhao at os dot amperecomputing.com 2024-04-10 7:43 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/114674] " dizhao at os dot amperecomputing.com 2024-04-10 8:34 ` acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-10 13:27 ` acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2024-04-10 14:00 ` acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-11 6:40 ` dizhao at os dot amperecomputing.com 2024-05-07 13:44 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-07 13:46 ` acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-114674-4-g3oFy6sJOU@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).