From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 00078385840B; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 07:07:19 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 00078385840B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1712819240; bh=m9kXurK0IPyypwpnH4fbzC+4tkGwUPQONXDBgnGYbJU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=MMnY2O2VxfDIZFP25io04+YmbpdEf/+bJJG7g0SYI0BoIZcn7vZWQEi9UHTqL+VJu ITc8anVJ7xpx3kA2lZt5t2bFdd5k6GCgCturfW0WeGDyUxYXITvK9fq1b1YrUE6vIY f9NM3goXO0v9gGFiR/CLbBFnWonrKPFyR0/EJCd0= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/114688] repeat load argument of an inline function Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 07:07:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114688 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114591#c13 is talking about = this exact thing ... So this might be expected for x86_64.=