From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 00078385840B; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 07:07:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 00078385840B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1712819240;
	bh=m9kXurK0IPyypwpnH4fbzC+4tkGwUPQONXDBgnGYbJU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=MMnY2O2VxfDIZFP25io04+YmbpdEf/+bJJG7g0SYI0BoIZcn7vZWQEi9UHTqL+VJu
	 ITc8anVJ7xpx3kA2lZt5t2bFdd5k6GCgCturfW0WeGDyUxYXITvK9fq1b1YrUE6vIY
	 f9NM3goXO0v9gGFiR/CLbBFnWonrKPFyR0/EJCd0=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/114688] repeat load argument of an inline
 function
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 07:07:19 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, ra
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114688-4-LevJAu1hiu@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114688-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114688-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114688

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114591#c13 is talking about =
this
exact thing ...

So this might be expected for x86_64.=