From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id EA15238930E3; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:23:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EA15238930E3
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1718889795;
	bh=Ty0D3BepY1PaAcUHWcYzf4mD//e+nxVlggv2PoLUt98=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=R49lMQ2SMutA3UHfZLUX0g0ruikwHBOLzERuuSEj977fjHKFEqOIPGKHRbvCKpXuv
	 uhSaSq1+RkAWfk+QPktduAiZQx3XP0RQ8Rq/5S6IvhuR7iESF3NZ5T0o7t3OISPzqW
	 hA9LxvMy831DRBdSthOjXm+/aC7k8IX38VE3f/tM=
From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/114691] [11 Regression] Bogus ignoring loop annotation
 warning
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:23:15 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114691-4-VCMhFeh0M1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114691-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114691-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114691

--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
<jakub@gcc.gnu.org>:

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6ec50f5b9a8842f92d65dbd8fcc546f0f6902585

commit r11-11505-g6ec50f5b9a8842f92d65dbd8fcc546f0f6902585
Author: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Apr 12 20:53:10 2024 +0200

    c++: Fix bogus warnings about ignored annotations [PR114691]

    The middle-end warns about the ANNOTATE_EXPR added for while/for loops
    if they declare a var inside of the loop condition.
    This is because the assumption is that ANNOTATE_EXPR argument is used
    immediately in a COND_EXPR (later GIMPLE_COND), but simplify_loop_decl_=
cond
    wraps the ANNOTATE_EXPR inside of a TRUTH_NOT_EXPR, so it no longer
    holds.

    The following patch fixes that by adding the TRUTH_NOT_EXPR inside of t=
he
    ANNOTATE_EXPR argument if any.

    2024-04-12  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

            PR c++/114691
            * semantics.c (simplify_loop_decl_cond): Use cp_build_unary_op =
with
            TRUTH_NOT_EXPR on ANNOTATE_EXPR argument (if any) rather than
            ANNOTATE_EXPR itself.

            * g++.dg/ext/pr114691.C: New test.

    (cherry picked from commit 91146346f57cc54dfeb2669347edd0eb3d13af7f)=