From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 77A7C3858D20; Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:25:45 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 77A7C3858D20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1712863545;
	bh=ki9vVNMrDqYxFFM395Iqtw8fypwaFo1vj7hRAXeF9QQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ttbpYBl0DMsLVCj0Xd7MT/9/90w+HqqYNAq5eYvViy5nRekK/m/gK1/0hMkEVk7/W
	 MLoV7cKIHM2qAZaiRi5O7SSsLsBLes5JVMhzeqEKdvaUYkjjCc3aTRUXk0ySt3YK91
	 B5Uxm6FzsWe82qOJ3rG13uEM1oE6sd0Iuc/Tn9aA=
From: "bergner at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/114698] [12/13/14 regression] dcfldd produces wrong sha256
 sum on ppc64le and -O3 since r12-5244-g64f3e71c302b4a
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 19:25:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-114698-4-0Wm07ZogpZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114698-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114698-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114698

Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner <bergner at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> Note this implementation of sha2.c is shared all over the place it seems =
and
> has this known issue ...

Confirmed that the patch fixes the error.  It's too bad the "fix" hasn't be=
en
as widely shared. :-(

Closing this as INVALID.=