From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C70963858282; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:15:35 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C70963858282
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1712916935;
	bh=4R8xepz3DmQBtiUD7qDME5xMv/nHes7TIUnViTZidb8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=A9s6pqZyXXXjAh2H2Q99gJGvUN67S3pckOtgceBJprA/rvMseDDX5xwyeU/IwH2pZ
	 SeyktZH1hBzVsNOd/QlnEuXhenlhOCgR0Wh/dgsB9w45qIvO0XF6Jib+yV0LIxwf6D
	 yb+CilbzZFn74F20gCORoz2yPzHwlrjslMw0XkFQ=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/114700] middle-end optimization generates wrong code
 with -fsanitize=undefined
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 10:15:32 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-114700-4-1T27WNNoso@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114700-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114700-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114700

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Hu Lin from comment #14)
> Created attachment 57933 [details]
> Untested fix.

When a pattern already has one if, can't you just add that to the preexisti=
ng
if rather than adding yet another one.=