From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 682573858426; Sat, 13 Apr 2024 17:50:55 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 682573858426
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1713030655;
	bh=wsc6GOJN+w08DEC5HDedU3Cg9YHjlRFX2gHKTtLcFVg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=DGn2gREvGLZrAIQlr6gKr+4yM7VR1Em/HDhywX7Zf8q6kECTi113lyoaKc09aKFoR
	 5QQGnPc7L+0UrdXo7f7lPjHV4ixn87/ZbcV/PKrvu7gdD9Rn1yAAimWTMDqSbzaHPu
	 BzZG1g78GFcGOYjTo5UYQmCtMF3HfeWO2Nf+cRLI=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114711] Missed optimization: fold load of
 global constant array if there is obivous pattern
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2024 17:50:55 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status keywords everconfirmed
 cf_reconfirmed_on bug_severity
Message-ID: <bug-114711-4-PanKgA5uQg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114711-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114711-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114711

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
           Keywords|                            |missed-optimization
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-04-13
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
In the openssl code, it is a loop which can be unrolled and gcc does and th=
en
is able to handle the load for string just fine but not the resulting ID. S=
ee
the linked issue for that.


But confirmed on this one but it is definitely harder.=