From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 016B7384AB4D; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:52:49 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 016B7384AB4D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714053170;
	bh=ketdL60DTrfb/Gt0DEaeXOJ5sTro6SMpPwtg2fdtlWA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Rg/XLjEwFV5Pn5DdcmqhurZMUFsp3xEn82yd4xXtfK3bjKunKkQGjbUc4m1cNwF1P
	 gTf2eriODCrQgHlkGJwz4jlfKggJON/hP9Aa6EVEKxyPXjAxqTNl6gFmgHd3kC6q7P
	 uCesuLBxoVVANfsC69CwQudnKT1VZ+YmktN85pFM=
From: "rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/114734] [14] RISC-V rv64gcv_zvl256b miscompile with
 -flto -O3 -mrvv-vector-bits=zvl
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:52:48 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-bisection, wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114734-4-mf7cx4x8wX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114734-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114734-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114734

--- Comment #10 from Robin Dapp <rdapp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes it helps.  Great that get_gimple_for_ssa_name is right below
get_rtx_for_ssa_name that I stepped through several times while debugging a=
nd I
didn't realize the connection, grrrr.

But thanks!  Good thing it can be solved like that.

I cannot do a bootstrap/regtest for aarch64 because cfarm185 is almost out =
of
disk space.  As the bug is old and very unlikely to trigger it can surely w=
ait
for GCC15?=