From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2F6D6385840D; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:35:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2F6D6385840D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1713958553;
	bh=UP+F0i0z4BS98u40/xRBwa/e/0ARjYpo0AH2urAMe9o=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=k2jDMsIqVCXglw8yGD1i+7wzemCylihk9dcMyQf+nX6o5yLZuilyRDAW26jbP5PbT
	 4uE6OlkIUoStYqCjl1rI7+c9u0Wd6mgFvupFb5KMFnqCJraOpvIByK5vGAeAcHaVrg
	 l3gHzLf8ivWfGQIbDyKHiDu2xRVuhSuzQicxEmzU=
From: "gejoed at rediffmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/114751] .gcda:stamp mismatch with notes file
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 11:35:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.4.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: gejoed at rediffmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114751-4-6K9Wkopvew@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114751-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114751-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114751

--- Comment #7 from Gejoe <gejoed at rediffmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> I have no idea why the values differ but I suspect the copying since we s=
eem
> to use the file modification time at some point.  As a workaround I would
> suggest
> to binary-patch one of the file to make the stamp match the other ...

We do use __gcov_dump() in the program execution to get all the gcda files,=
 tar
them up to a file name and we move that to the workspace where build was do=
ne
we use a script to run gcov so that gcov files are created finally. So, will
there be any changes in GCC 11.x (compared to 10.3.0) where __gcov_dump and=
 the
ensuing copy process need to be taken care in a better way ?=20

I'm not sure of the binary-patching of the file mentioned above. Can you=20
elaborate that suggestion ?=20

Thank you for bearing with my queries patiently and for the possible help
given.=