From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B8303384641A; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 06:24:33 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B8303384641A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1714026274; bh=Wy+zJ05O3mrwKxfmIZ1MEzfvvlHwd3+tnClVld+ZLfw=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=iz1S3nDQ4kmo446S1ttNEIl3/PkFcMgTdXy3GhEdU2gvH61aAuqqoflJJPlI+5DWZ rRk/GSdhI9E0hS3WqEutgjqfGkk4P0LKFJmYi9lgqkXDHdAH/SGiyTCOALqOXRzdsq oICxiOyht+HbixK+974tANTipi6kJy39y7BExVvA= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/114751] .gcda:stamp mismatch with notes file Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 06:24:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.4.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114751 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- I don't know of any difference compared to older compilers but gcov isn't my main expertise. I fear you have to dig into the gcov code to see where and= how we exactly invent the stamp to see where it goes wrong for you. It might be possible to ask on the gcc-help@ mailinglist as well as that mi= ght receive a wider audience than bugzilla.=