From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D0F3A3861871; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 07:51:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D0F3A3861871
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1713426680;
	bh=WzyHi3MxgEVP2nWmi8Da0ao4/CfWi98cbUJ9wYHe1Sw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=NC/Ae7Lhcb+fUKRHi9H3T/gkX2V3wrX+RaOSfUQ0+MOlOUISZunFFp2tIW+n7ydAA
	 07xBYH/s5XuTYagoQFw3hsoeDBQCdeQoxRh85syXH6FyiJUbgyiJbl4PCQFLJSdHUS
	 8r/CsXvSlvTs9fCIRVequhH/psWViRldVr2ZPxPA=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libgcc/114755] wrong code with _BitInt() modulo at -O0 on
 aarch64
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 07:51:20 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libgcc
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-114755-4-VDrHclm5uV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114755-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114755-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114755

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Should be fixed now.=