From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 9E9453858D3C; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 19:35:36 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9E9453858D3C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1713382536; bh=77GP1tO/LyFXBBsEnXDj3OUKvwlx3z27QZbQlepcCNQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KqosVAJspZM1s7nYeu40TYjoUB4j/J/Vaf0MBbe6YipfZiHFZjOSvNYV6BJ7uQ6K9 uPYoSkSssm/BmUXVGxTsOWvr7u71Ka6HttjhjTVicX0a+L0lmYDiN2TJoFCBTw5Zo/ y1YL3DL0WkipBOcj+fED3aqtQc/F/yMsQPVICtWU= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/114756] [14] RISC-V rv32imc miscompile with -fdata-sections Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 19:35:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114756 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Basically what is happening is the linker relaxation code is turning it into something which is wrong. But GCC's invalid use of %lo(n+4)(a5) with a (invalid) corresponding %hi(n) is confusing the relaxation code really.=