From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C57E13858CD1; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:03:08 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C57E13858CD1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1713438188; bh=kRuWTBOFlAMk+OrzAaACn4WaC/knZ+w4VCEz8Tn/ujM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qkEnF3dZqMDv/F9Kufsq9EmrbiOhhFoojD0+iLbOAA11zuyNZu6EB6EiWPwveJmpN MGGTskh/milX8YNDJpcg7lVDAS1SnDIDo1jLjrsw0WJoO7e2SpDKnJLF+0sr7gmjIS kq47ir//MqBnGEak9qeZ1Qfxgv/u8FUZR8ENh1Zo= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libgcc/114762] wrong code with _BitInt() division by "BITINT_NN_MIN" Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:03:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libgcc X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status assigned_to attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114762 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2024-04-18 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gn= u.org --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 57982 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D57982&action=3Dedit gcc14-pr114762.patch Untested fix. Note, -0x10000000000000000wb is not _BitInt(65) minimum, but _BitInt(66) wi= th value equal to _BitInt(65) minimum.=