From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 93D26384AB57; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 02:10:25 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 93D26384AB57
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1713838225;
	bh=c5WMklwxaSiqWf8uqjm9jjE55ZYUSyQMPlDO+smSoTs=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=DDlWvvJV/be0+6yWEhMEkJKEgJl3/U/v6YZl5JzyvQhCXIYRN/PnWx3Y6eYDuaf9j
	 Pll9DsjDF806kkdVwbyO5NFk1m/Ii9O+y8jwbFyNN+px27d5nT1OEoIiWQvnPtm9J6
	 hVZ2c1971MjVgPYx0uQElpyFQq1Co1TG7WWLrvOk=
From: "iamanonymous.cs at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug analyzer/114778] ICE: in get_region_for_local, at
 analyzer/region.cc:1366
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 02:10:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: analyzer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iamanonymous.cs at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114778-4-olb0f7ye2l@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114778-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114778-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114778

--- Comment #3 from Anonymous <iamanonymous.cs at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1)
> Thanks for filing this.
>=20
> It's failing this assertion in frame_region::get_region_for_local :
>=20
> 1421		case VAR_DECL:
> 1422		  gcc_assert (!is_global_var (expr));
> 1423		  /* Fall through.  */
> 1424		case PARM_DECL:
> 1425		case RESULT_DECL:
> 1426		  gcc_assert (DECL_CONTEXT (expr) =3D=3D m_fun.decl);
> 1427		  break;
>=20
> (gdb) pt expr
>  <var_decl 0x7fffea8212d0 D.2795
>     type <integer_type 0x7fffea664000 sizetype public unsigned DI
>         size <integer_cst 0x7fffea644f48 constant 64>
>         unit-size <integer_cst 0x7fffea644f60 constant 8>
>         align:64 warn_if_not_align:0 symtab:0 alias-set -1 canonical-type
> 0x7fffea664000 precision:64 min <integer_cst 0x7fffea644f78 0> max
> <integer_cst 0x7fffea6455e0 18446744073709551615>>
>     used unsigned ignored DI ../../src/pr114778.c:6:5 size <integer_cst
> 0x7fffea644f48 64> unit-size <integer_cst 0x7fffea644f60 8>
>     align:64 warn_if_not_align:0 context <function_decl 0x7fffea7f5a00 f>>
>=20
> (gdb) p m_fun.decl
> $1 =3D <function_decl 0x7fffea7f5600 a>
>=20
> Looks like another ICE due to GCC's nested functions extension for C, whi=
ch
> the analyzer doesn't yet support.

Thank you for your answer to this issue!=