From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id B2272385841E; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:10:17 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B2272385841E DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1713654617; bh=yeMDbQLJE1zNsDryL0CQrNafap5ShpiKOi3hBWG5faE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PHbLqttC37E2WWhI32/Al2T3/SmF+xv3IG4C44Ykqi4Q55DdjxJWRGw37fJ/dqHZI l19h/2aKfADRlx4vMNu61YsQ4kRn/hpsVc5tdqMn9OD3gjHFCh56Fw8MCROUtJH1fu xdlHwPpGNUVYI4DJlmd6g3b1OgYcK5Ku0e+ovtOU= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114787] [13/14 Regression] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu (the generated code hangs) Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 23:10:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-bisection, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords cf_known_to_work target_milestone cf_known_to_fail short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114787 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needs-bisection Known to work| |12.1.0 Target Milestone|14.0 |13.3 Known to fail| |13.1.0 Summary|[14 Regression] wrong code |[13/14 Regression] wrong |at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu |code at -O1 on |(the generated code hangs) |x86_64-linux-gnu (the | |generated code hangs) --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- So with GCC 13, with `-fdump-tree-all-all`, we get the same wrong code as on the trunk. This is why I was I misunderstood thinking it was a target issue as I was comparing the dumps between GCC 13 and the trunk with -all enabled but it w= as broken in GCC 13 too. Anyways I tested GCC 12.3.0 and it looks to be working there. It would be useful to get another bisect done this time with `-O1 -fdump-tree-all-all` .=