From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D81CF385DC3F; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 22:03:17 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D81CF385DC3F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1713650597;
	bh=vHF0SsmsucIjKPEPzeVgIRq2StKtYGZQ/j6CB4fyEz8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=lUtz+AZ6ByjevpGtgQPa8I6FuEoCvYAH+2Ck5DMiSJx6nmkqUv0n0EdbBkxYXp7MQ
	 QX7H75gGM9tUN78wgPnl/0Tryn6ZqmaPSYFSq/r3gi0qXwMlRZr+iXIvtVLQaUYAW4
	 Rcc2A4MnXuzwq36UVCIuh/pHijtRHNipkvNuy8Ag=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/114787] [14 Regression] wrong code at -O1 on
 x86_64-linux-gnu (the generated code hangs)
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 22:03:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget component
Message-ID: <bug-114787-4-ut8kyWrpux@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114787-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114787-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114787

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Target|                            |x86_64-linux-gnu
          Component|tree-optimization           |target

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The first difference besides prediction/counts on the BB is in the register
allocator.

The code for aarch64 looks ok too.=