public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114792] [14 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 with "-fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in get_loop_body, at cfgloop.cc:903 Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 06:14:52 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-114792-4-v2vwCcWqHd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-114792-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114792 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #58024|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Created attachment 58033 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58033&action=edit patch I'm now testing this which is more minimal surgery at least making sure we process loops in similar order as unrolling does. I'm not 100% convinced this is enough but it restores part of the consistency (unroll also doesn't unloop an outer loop before cleaning up the CFG and rebuilding loops after unlooping an inner loop).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-25 6:14 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-04-21 11:39 [Bug tree-optimization/114792] New: " zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch 2024-04-21 15:33 ` [Bug tree-optimization/114792] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2024-04-21 20:25 ` [Bug tree-optimization/114792] [14 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-21 20:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-22 7:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-24 13:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-24 13:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-25 5:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-25 6:13 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-25 6:14 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2024-04-25 13:20 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-04-25 13:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-114792-4-v2vwCcWqHd@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).