From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BBA81384AB67; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:54:59 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BBA81384AB67
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1713815699;
	bh=haAprKs2F8+RtKPuyI9QaKhJ7xG6VeCKu4XFt1FboNU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=IfP2R2a9R1w4VYYMCezmhPW9RiAz1hppkZ2QNdvoN9/+WBBZDKyCJTzWuUbLWs5DX
	 BCCOG8EwPJwGtH21czNPMqN628EJt74KYTDtR2Z8PkBPk/94+yCO0yTbQfh2oA3Jmb
	 B/CYAsJa3iaj/RHZ4SRLqEe3jh6Ey6KdWcwb9X1c=
From: "jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/114808] Qualified void return type is not diagnosed
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 19:54:59 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid, diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114808-4-Z00VVdwQZ3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114808-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114808-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114808

--- Comment #7 from Joseph S. Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, this is deliberate following the resolution of DR#423 which means
qualifiers are ignored on function return types (it's still diagnosed in
pre-C11 modes).=