From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9A5E9384B11C; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 18:01:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9A5E9384B11C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1713981689;
	bh=fCOt017OOhGK4GScZmveO9WdZHLUvCrcgBfXfQcZkxE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Muli7col9ItBmgLe23W4UTta8Wkw+2x6GpfoDy2zuD0Rk6evBb2cJa3MXowpzMcjs
	 MPQGwt93HLX3UGEftk/y+h068gxa+t5SZRdLLzPb2EYLCjDPqcAKO+j9pGntV0FCeu
	 iMeobeHh5MRrutqV5FXT79KeDOzGBug5bkCEtzTY=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/114839] g++-linked FreeBSD static binaries abort upon
 exception
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 18:01:29 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114839-4-DeSpZRlU5n@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114839-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114839-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114839

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hmm, I wonder why freebsd needs to be different from every most other targe=
ts
though here:
```
config/alpha/elf.h:#define LINK_EH_SPEC "%{!static|static-pie:--eh-frame-hd=
r} "
config/arc/linux.h:#define LINK_EH_SPEC "--eh-frame-hdr "
config/dragonfly.h:#define LINK_EH_SPEC "--eh-frame-hdr"
config/freebsd.h:#define LINK_EH_SPEC "%{!static|static-pie:--eh-frame-hdr}=
 "
config/fuchsia.h:                 "%{!no-eh-frame-hdr: --eh-frame-hdr}" \
config/gnu-user.h:#define LINK_EH_SPEC "%{!static|static-pie:--eh-frame-hdr=
} "
config/netbsd.h:#define LINK_EH_SPEC "%{!static|static-pie:--eh-frame-hdr} "
config/openbsd.h:#define LINK_EH_SPEC "%{!static|static-pie:--eh-frame-hdr}=
 "
config/sol2.h:   --eh-frame-hdr to create the required .eh_frame_hdr sectio=
ns.=20
*/
config/sol2.h:#define LINK_EH_SPEC "%{!static|static-pie:--eh-frame-hdr} "

```

Is it the case that unwinder from LLVM needs a .eh_frame_hdr for static
binaries while GCC's libgcc one does not?=