From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id BFB3E3858D33; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 05:20:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BFB3E3858D33 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1714368026; bh=zB0my30vfTyzPrUMyXilsYMKIUvZI3zVLPuOTotxVDI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=rtbkvY78CpFzy+gBlD6B1hgjz4dCpMVzdrWcwUVAiPIKoYxdJau/0PnxZCta12ooG FO600gzJQBkj7JkapuvigISoZiUA1EXd/ZCuzo3kyYCKIqhWOptT67vgbEXBp2XmHj UVBFxtvOijuORLWdwbypoJhxFlIfVBjsvjPeTxpw= From: "linkw at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/114846] powerpc: epilogue in _Unwind_RaiseException corrupts return value due to __builtin_eh_return Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 05:20:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: linkw at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114846 Kewen Lin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |linkw at gcc dot gn= u.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #4 from Kewen Lin --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #2) > > As https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114843#c8, we may nee= d some > > similar handling like r14-6440-g4b421728289e6f. >=20 > Note rs6000_emit_epilogue mostly handles eh_returns so it might not be as > hard as other targets. Yes, making a patch.=