From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0D2543858D33; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 09:05:59 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0D2543858D33
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714208760;
	bh=N4wSgUtnTSdU6h8jZwSEGMayiD56xJRgLm108BE1FdE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=kIxqZiHoIdCNV5XpWAzgDpTNE/MsZtwKbsPBxTDIz5OfmYgbNrgZGvi8qYy/oAlkZ
	 OIH8qdg2gedyDPFLwRi+1un0cga06/2g3u13qWhOGTXUtnqtUQ0wTe0lNo8DZ9iae2
	 XPEhvILkPhbTRWmpEB5VHAQG3Y2rWd2tqo8xuyvg=
From: "chenglulu at loongson dot cn" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/114848] loongarch: epilogue in _Unwind_RaiseException
 corrupts return value due to __builtin_eh_return
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 09:05:59 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: chenglulu at loongson dot cn
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114848-4-fwsXgMNuVm@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114848-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114848-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114848

--- Comment #5 from chenglulu <chenglulu at loongson dot cn> ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #3)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1)
> > > Hmm, AFAIK this should be already fixed with r14-6440?
> > >=20
> > > I cannot reproduce it with r14-9823 but maybe it has regressed again =
in the
> > > recent weeks.
> >=20
> > Oh I only tested gcc 13.2.0. If it is fixed you can close it.
>=20
> Hmm it looks like we need a backport to releases/gcc-13 (and 12?)

I have backpointed r14-6440 to gcc-13 and gcc-12 and am testing

>=20
> I thought the bug was introduced by my shrink-wrap change (r14-545) so I
> didn't proposed a backport.  But it seems I was wrong and the bug exists
> even before r14-545.=