From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4D8783858D38; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 17:01:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4D8783858D38
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714064475;
	bh=bSECLzH2I4wCfTJ0hVt7ed3+QOsJYHZAvOchaxrLlr0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=SZAV/gnTwadGNLj2O1HpVETjhiIQ9827FuXloFSi0XlQyH7LxVQEhm/7yMPwgGIEa
	 TnFneaAvYQmkRSPrnebEzUBHMZWIQlppAW+Lo7TTAH8o1+hL5ah1c1JAd7osQ8dVKZ
	 2Q9vuVXsSWo1m362RMFcoiYGaZwKsQENOKFjrDGw=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/114851] Alternative to -Wmisexpect from LLVM in
 GCC
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 17:01:14 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: blocked bug_severity
Message-ID: <bug-114851-4-csByuopppM@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114851-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114851-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114851

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |87403
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I don't think GCC has a warning (yet).


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D87403
[Bug 87403] [Meta-bug] Issues that suggest a new warning=