From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id CB15B3858403; Thu, 25 Apr 2024 17:06:19 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CB15B3858403 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1714064779; bh=XElDxtXVH1037Vo6t7fyOO0CP24QQtDVkH1dNYpeuJk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JhQ8k8x8upiWiX6ACBWvMirXe68EcXceDttnpgFWHJ07GZHIT11VDC5s29mPvjGnW GDuz+UC0rbQ2nYK16lCD1uK6vdn4rdHCr6ciXaSo8UOApw7Z/KYuNBWl95D/SVOFpr KshZFmGesQQ/0qNf8Ka87Rq0riUQNSuICYZO6eWI= From: "zamazan4ik at tut dot by" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug gcov-profile/114851] Alternative to -Wmisexpect from LLVM in GCC Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 17:06:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: gcov-profile X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: zamazan4ik at tut dot by X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114851 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Zaitsev --- > Though I do wonder if the "hints" are used instead of the PGO here. We already discussed this question a bit in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112806 . If I understand correctly, no clear answer yet: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D112806#c4 .=