From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C09F23858C98; Mon, 29 Apr 2024 11:06:43 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C09F23858C98
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714388803;
	bh=5vShaSq6m2HU6yPe0yKshOVLBCa8fRu5iSMd6eD8UR0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=fKqDmwE1nABpjcN9YtLZyXm/Xpoth0AjGDysfVN8fB+CVF5K7iCddhy6LLE6Ba7ca
	 Noi+CkYH22BBIQQ6UwuNguzJTCstX49KC44DOWlcimsERKUHx+HnvXRKIwBEezTqQV
	 tMMptEBb6tpihKjbqw9lOxuG7JpGssI3U/fFim14=
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/114859] [14/15 Regression] Seeing new segmentation
 fault in same_type_as since r14-9752
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 11:06:43 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114859-4-0THJVwC4st@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114859-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114859-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114859

--- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hi Jakub,

It's good news that the patch does indeed fix the full problem.

I committed to 15-branch with corrections to the ChangeLogs, as requested by
Mikael. What both of us missed was that I screwed up in the commit message =
by
using the wrong PR number; 114959 instead of 114859. The testcase also has =
the
wrong number, all of which came about because I initially named the working
directory incorrectly. I am trying to things in too much of a hurry late at
night!

I do apologise for giving you a bit of extra work in backporting to the RC.
I'll fix up 15-branch tomorrow morning.

Regards

Paul=