From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 258113858D34; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 05:37:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 258113858D34
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714282666;
	bh=qkHZmLmmIeRD5Ce5THFo/uZXH/73Jx4aP7zDM1SpdjY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=MmLdN9yLU4FsIHAqVkgh6L4b/AUz1PKCXYlNJEkKud4yQb3BPat5erZ9yS8klCsA+
	 zgF0ndx0pFmiFKCsS1Zz9lPT1h26zosBvyJy9DvYNEnclu9UXlJFzEvKX54K/PIgjY
	 rOgVmSfmEKaqDYhY994eo0NnQeXQtBf+sus3e0Jo=
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/114859] [14/15 Regression] Seeing new segmentation
 fault in same_type_as since r14-9752
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 05:37:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-114859-4-YqlEvZXiWo@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114859-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114859-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114859

Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |anlauf at gmx dot de

--- Comment #13 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> There is still time, probably until Tuesday morning, so if it is committed
> say by Monday to trunk, it can be cherry-picked then.  I'd prefer to see =
the
> whole patch before acking it for 14.1, possibly even build a test rpm whi=
ch
> could verify if the package now works again.

OK - I am on to it.

Thanks

Paul

@Harald - I will submit to the list a bit later on and, hopefully, will com=
mit
tonight.=