From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D85DC3858C60; Fri, 26 Apr 2024 15:55:21 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D85DC3858C60
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714146921;
	bh=AGGNi+lZM2/ad0FCBQKqx265AJ8xPHDCt86piyW4YoA=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=h1jwVWuuw0GvRtJEZ/m/EiHBQCc+WL8v032bpMsCI/TR3y0uamXYHSCf4oTl71VV+
	 cGvbpcfXRY8pczwzQe3OwoqW+XYRfp7u/3buQmi+z84Ardw9Nl/oSAjeJ21yqGhZYk
	 7d2zeLZCTdUj4J1/VDGQ6AQ45xCppN4cC2U89xfU=
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114864] [12/13/14/15 regression] wrong code
 at -O1 with "-fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-fre" on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 15:55:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114864-4-HaxWhLBewR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114864-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114864-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114864

--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes, this is a known issue in SRA, see PR optimization/111873, but it
apparently shows up only with nonsensical combinations of switches so, well=
...=