From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 8D7A13858CDB; Thu,  2 May 2024 11:40:12 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8D7A13858CDB
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714650012;
	bh=l9vzMSnoDHnYuOyUL3VDAEkOt7HkTrOsALMk2pQ+cuM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=StUE2Lf/DkVGcUDtRNeiwZ7XEISmWRojxa6wqLIkm8P0wLbJ1E9LEpX5hGXka1EIA
	 GRH5kpQHbD0i7lf7ljGkeOgeprFnqsLQFJyKDYlnSV0DW5lCLiJZC8RObnE2EOuWZI
	 Z4MBM6Qn2JqaUYbrTDNBC0fkZ7SMXlp+Oa2IFvfs=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/114865] [13/14/15 Regression]
 std::atomic<X>::compare_exchange_strong seems to hang under GCC 13  for C++11
Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 11:40:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114865-4-F8DZVF5rlR@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114865-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114865-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114865

--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Because a constexpr function can't have an if statement in C++11.

But maybe we should just clear padding unconditionally for C++11.=