From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id AE3413858401; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 00:22:49 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org AE3413858401 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1714177369; bh=qdUwyhwbyAexLaQx5y1H240JLTcSARZjbj+ltBlQZCg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pRB70Ts1prGtPJmHIfSRC/SHVfexxzvwo0oADynxCROfhfI9eSFQPGNRvP5fu0Fmf 2mPNAozTRloi9X5y0pHCZKkza+5JuODyi4US9zVNQ3rH40kcahWb7m5Anv9pHDeGGH rdSydIecSA12w09N3oyIeRzE0gopoShXZ1N9K78E= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/114865] [13/14/15 Regression] std::atomic::compare_exchange_strong seems to hang under GCC 13 on Ubuntu 23.04 Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 00:22:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114865 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Peter Dimov from comment #4) > but I believe it's independent of standard level and address model. No it is dependent on the standard level. C++11 fails but C++14, C++17 and C++20 all pass.=