From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 024AC3858C50; Sat, 27 Apr 2024 00:13:16 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 024AC3858C50
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714176797;
	bh=qeFBvZUUMqlvcBy9LUlXYmQeMQSt04BQEPjArtCft2c=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=RWn2K9+9Ib38gZYdNL5+p1y+oDUIh0tGHyJna+QfaQgqC1EMZ+jMjivQPpwid4HCN
	 0JM+6+2iuC/ZL04PborlA4QFYAJvVrfpYcGObc2HuwPQd8I50e+SShKreGbRzc568s
	 aXQiwm12eTyphUKnt9ZjVxRKqmODLTDdLKOKH2vw=
From: "pdimov at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/114865] [13/14/15 Regression]
 std::atomic<X>::compare_exchange_strong seems to hang under GCC 13 on Ubuntu
 23.04
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 00:13:16 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pdimov at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114865-4-MdjKJZjycs@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114865-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114865-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114865

--- Comment #4 from Peter Dimov <pdimov at gmail dot com> ---
This

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/boostorg/uuid/feature/gcc_pr_114865/test/=
test_gcc_pr114865.cpp

exhibits the problem for me on GCC 13/14. I'm only seeing the hang with
-std=3Dc++11 -m32 in the CI run because this combination is tested first, b=
ut I
believe it's independent of standard level and address model.=