From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 405193858C35; Wed,  8 May 2024 19:35:14 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 405193858C35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1715196914;
	bh=gsc6wCu/qenR+XzhlCUr8aQOhS9ZFGBQkY0EEko4OtI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=gOp6f6st6imfhPMp9YpoHT7kAYxDIgDAL+AXZtPl/5yCuzFTloFhSOqUxDiP6xfjU
	 vXR6uPuWtKrw0gNRE2wWifo9XVFR3rChrGlLiujhB/R7UCTs5mG5IT35uu9ElISC8O
	 hP39jJV1HfTD/MLb3ElICgztV/LVeIRqiHiGxlak=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114872] [13/14/15 Regression] Miscompilation
 with -O2 after commit r13-8037
Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 19:35:13 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status see_also resolution
Message-ID: <bug-114872-4-zz1bUbxHvW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114872-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114872-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114872

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
           See Also|                            |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
                   |                            |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D56512
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #27 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7908799/xsh/longjmp.html


The requirement of using volatile has been there a long time before your co=
de
was written ...=