From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 600643858D3C; Thu,  2 May 2024 07:26:13 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 600643858D3C
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714634773;
	bh=zlWJbP8JXYK3giX2kh1sKVWf9I5QGyrvpvlK/Tpf81g=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Use+2NiAwsQ+a2t2Kf0ztl3j/wTWoZW+JMBtDqRiZpkqr6nYySHWkvmJMon0QyuZa
	 Gh231iNLUPZ8Al9RH2CnNXXuISOaE7LRa+szlDvGTSmcVxM/eY4cHeV2+frbehKQJq
	 URxLdP0GSXINuKbFvFonPFy1q9oaCmoKWMn3FOHk=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/114895] Build failure with !HAVE_WORKING_STAT
Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 07:26:12 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114895-4-UmJ5JIxQHa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114895-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114895-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114895

--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #8)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> > So besides maybe no way to reproduce the failure the source still has t=
he
> > issue
> > described.
>=20
> Sorry, not following -- jakub's attached one has #define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS
> 64, so we should be fine?

Iff !HAVE_WORKING_STAT (for whatever reason) but also !defined(__MINGW32__)
then the source will fail to build.  It looks like the key is
!HAVE_WORKING_STAT, not sure why defined(__MINGW32__) is checked here.=