From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0DEE83858D34; Thu,  2 May 2024 10:56:02 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0DEE83858D34
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714647362;
	bh=Ae9y6eZP7daVQAEPvy5ufcLH8Hw0m3frKVEn8LEg/pU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=OawwK0QfoZVqfNK0yodN1qrWx7wFOf0r5Y2xuyx54rXK4RuvlITnJ3ePLEZGJdzau
	 iKc/D0qowl68u5lp195kHIshnC5r6NiLPtf4NQAsf8hp+bDA/MQm3/KJjMQmnFupYT
	 T6pPyWV4/UHklScgvhk2f7mIymiAD+Ztbc2d8iQg=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/114901] GCC internal_error on CTAD alias
Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 10:56:01 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords version
Message-ID: <bug-114901-4-sXebE8GNr9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114901-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114901-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114901

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code
            Version|unknown                     |13.2.1

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I suppose it's valid code?=