From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 1902C3858D39; Tue, 14 May 2024 20:09:08 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1902C3858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1715717349;
	bh=aTs5kaKh2BpD9Pqbj3YyLTG3NdNvEVEklFIGMslgRcw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=VBM81YdB1jes0GViM0vCuHJuE/n9b/UAXTi4qT5Wsx1KRQjKuUXaa+xTKN7WiMOzh
	 aD9pjuuc/P5Y9ggwODcbjFQa5J9CLdGDDG2dNP6sUt2WMMvrKXbGhFlW6glq8h2+n3
	 Ms920gHaeNNINh+21WlvCdJcIrXogWiiZB19TULU=
From: "segher at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/114902] [14/15 Regression] wrong code at -O3
 with "-fno-tree-vrp -fno-expensive-optimizations -fno-tree-dominator-opts" on
 x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 20:09:08 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: segher at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114902-4-cLiF4LwQyZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114902-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114902-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114902

--- Comment #11 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So, is there a simplified testcase that *actually* shows any *actual* probl=
em?=