From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 445F93858429; Mon,  6 May 2024 09:16:54 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 445F93858429
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714987014;
	bh=VG8QZsDR1eeIY9ItnimWXLkb5G4I2GEO4uNe2ma+RNI=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=fZUn6St39EZIN4YM+OiYSfyVgAN3V039/LStsTnBv+pO4/twjNQpv61P3s4SGSsS3
	 k+P4eBFORkbtGhJH/+73EzsVRTH43IDyCofiHHmVUynNPZp378399y/M5eeKjV7HmV
	 NHtI+O+1JBYcXNl/D+QSTpGiimRKpVczM/aKy4AE=
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114908] fails to optimize avx2 in-register
 permute written with std::experimental::simd
Date: Mon, 06 May 2024 09:16:53 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114908-4-9cseLMwtHv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114908-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114908-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114908

--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Mon, 6 May 2024, mkretz at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114908
>=20
> --- Comment #3 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) <mkretz at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> The stdx::simd implementation in this area is old and mainly tuned to be
> correct. I can rewrite the split and concat implementation to use
> __builtin_shufflevector (which wasn't available in GCC at the time when I
> originally implemented it). Doing so I can resolve this issue.
>=20
> How do you want to handle this? Because it would certainly be nice if the
> compiler can optimize this in the same way as Clang can. Should I try to =
come
> up with a testcase that doesn't need stdx::simd and then improve stdx::si=
md
> independently?

Yes, that would be nice (best the testcase w/o stdx::simd being a C
testcase even, no C++ abstraction).

I do think stdx::simd should be improved to use __builtin_shufflevector
though.=