From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 915B5385840D; Thu,  9 May 2024 09:54:14 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 915B5385840D
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1715248454;
	bh=Z4228gkNPC1+hzxOkkBF6L5qNl+BZlXosvuCY7QiOU4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=djTWRt5xUuYjTcNcGr36e4pzf3kq7/V5/PjBhYoNm5KMwjyCLZfV5FJku/u1eegMr
	 LfWSyqOYrii/69SSSvyGAOrfsxEw//RBY9aCozYp7vj8WZa/AMKS7M6WAwFRkLYDM+
	 CDxQBbb9vRuBezycK+37NuVuvNspVm9Uf78yNqPA=
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114912] [15 regression] SIGBUS in wi::copy<>
 on SPARC since r15-88-gc60b3e211c5557 since char array is not aligned to what
 it needs to be
Date: Thu, 09 May 2024 09:54:13 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114912-4-Ar81PNFWiW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114912-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114912-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114912

--- Comment #18 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot =
Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #16 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> (In reply to ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE from comment #14)
>> > --- Comment #13 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
>> > BTW, I'm waiting for a review, or at least a nod from a C++ savvy
>> > person here:
>> >
>> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-May/650634.html
>>=20
>> I can give the patch a whirl, thanks.
>
> I've attached a rebased patch against current mainline.  Let me know if it
> works on your end, and I'll commit.

I've included both this patch ...

>> I had Andrew's patch in my tree to avoid the issue.  Unfortunately,
>> Solaris/SPARC bootstrap is broken again due to PR ipa/114985.
>
> I have provided a patch for that PR as well, but the IPA folk need to say=
 if
> this is the correct approach.

... and that one in last night's SPARC bootstraps, which worked just
fine again.  Thanks.=