public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "nfxjfg at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/114923] New: gcc ignores escaping pointer and applies invalid optimization
Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 12:51:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-114923-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114923

            Bug ID: 114923
           Summary: gcc ignores escaping pointer and applies invalid
                    optimization
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: nfxjfg at googlemail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 58088
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58088&action=edit
Test case

In this test case, the pointer to a stack-allocated variable is passed to a
volatile variable. That means the pointer definitely escapes. But the compiler
seems to assume that the memory can't change, and returns the initialization
value of the buf variable.

I tried multiple variations of this. Sometimes it generates the correct code,
even though the situation is exactly the same. A call to an external function
often fixes it, but sometimes not (could not produce a reduced test case of the
latter).

This is reduced from some real-word code. The first register access passes the
memory pointer to the hardware, the second access starts the DMA. In the
real-world code there was some more stuff such as waiting for the DMA to
finish, but it doesn't matter for code generation. The code started to fail
after a DMA buffer was moved from a global variable to the stack.

Originally experienced on 12.2.0 / riscv32-unknown-elf, but on godlbolt I can
reproduce it with trunk and some other architectures.

             reply	other threads:[~2024-05-02 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-02 12:51 nfxjfg at googlemail dot com [this message]
2024-05-02 12:52 ` [Bug c/114923] " nfxjfg at googlemail dot com
2024-05-02 13:24 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-02 13:44 ` nfxjfg at googlemail dot com
2024-05-02 13:56 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-02 19:07 ` [Bug middle-end/114923] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-02 19:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-02 23:03 ` nfxjfg at googlemail dot com
2024-05-02 23:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-03  0:30 ` nfxjfg at googlemail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-114923-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).