public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "nfxjfg at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/114923] New: gcc ignores escaping pointer and applies invalid optimization Date: Thu, 02 May 2024 12:51:17 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-114923-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114923 Bug ID: 114923 Summary: gcc ignores escaping pointer and applies invalid optimization Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: nfxjfg at googlemail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 58088 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58088&action=edit Test case In this test case, the pointer to a stack-allocated variable is passed to a volatile variable. That means the pointer definitely escapes. But the compiler seems to assume that the memory can't change, and returns the initialization value of the buf variable. I tried multiple variations of this. Sometimes it generates the correct code, even though the situation is exactly the same. A call to an external function often fixes it, but sometimes not (could not produce a reduced test case of the latter). This is reduced from some real-word code. The first register access passes the memory pointer to the hardware, the second access starts the DMA. In the real-world code there was some more stuff such as waiting for the DMA to finish, but it doesn't matter for code generation. The code started to fail after a DMA buffer was moved from a global variable to the stack. Originally experienced on 12.2.0 / riscv32-unknown-elf, but on godlbolt I can reproduce it with trunk and some other architectures.
next reply other threads:[~2024-05-02 12:51 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-05-02 12:51 nfxjfg at googlemail dot com [this message] 2024-05-02 12:52 ` [Bug c/114923] " nfxjfg at googlemail dot com 2024-05-02 13:24 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-02 13:44 ` nfxjfg at googlemail dot com 2024-05-02 13:56 ` amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-02 19:07 ` [Bug middle-end/114923] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-02 19:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-02 23:03 ` nfxjfg at googlemail dot com 2024-05-02 23:42 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-03 0:30 ` nfxjfg at googlemail dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-114923-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).