From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 785293858C66; Fri,  3 May 2024 09:17:28 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 785293858C66
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714727848;
	bh=KPxsYfwFLz9JQfnfR5UX+jnhJ4kG51Oj8v2Xedw5rYM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=TG7hSV1wo8bXxjakzjDUp7r+DJ0XdrgYAQDXIsENiQybYCfcIu0NTRnTg9GvHWMpw
	 CAk0MdGYSnQvD3O9X6POGBNCoDXfokTYy6LWaT9zgv+aayTwavFCY5LYrYZ8SzMvxA
	 uhcuRn5SHiehjlGM0FI5bPTv0ooDlGnuN+BkSfXw=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/114933] [15 Regression] mcfgthread-1.6.1 typecheck failure:
 error: explicit specializations are not permitted here
Date: Fri, 03 May 2024 09:17:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114933-4-CluiZTv2BE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114933-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114933-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114933

--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to LIU Hao from comment #6)
> This paragraph is new in N4658 and was not in N4917. Better to avoid it by
> moving the specialization into an extern "C++" block. Thanks for the repo=
rt.

Right that is because of p2615r1 which is consider a DR due to cwg 2443:
https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2443.html and we only applied to bac=
k to
C++20 (due to it only needing for modules).=