From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8DF4C3858C66; Fri, 3 May 2024 09:09:31 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8DF4C3858C66 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1714727371; bh=bNaP6w+atT5HJbSlTozCnfRvIp1UeU/ji8anT88Hr+g=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=f78GRzbrIEDjaO4uICt1cELct6fx4jHSvG3s97nkVLQdOk9diezJ6PUyPx8tfLnTJ Erkd5/FaFMt6y4RlWFkzU8PiVSmZQsp3RIc6C/gC7Kn2vWJBAmAeozAoDwzVGvje5n aYi5BWBF4lEup8k37YKpcblr/XT6/PFwa2dRziNI= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/114933] [15 Regression] mcfgthread-1.6.1 typecheck failure: error: explicit specializations are not permitted here Date: Fri, 03 May 2024 09:09:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114933 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Sergei Trofimovich from comment #1) > /cc LIU Hao in case it's a new c++20 restriction and mcfgthread would need > to adapt. Looks like it is one: https://cplusplus.github.io/CWG/issues/2443.html=