From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 60708385E836; Fri,  3 May 2024 09:10:56 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 60708385E836
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1714727456;
	bh=pLp8NSxosQ00I7C80wmin9dKTQX55Sg39kQ5wRRDFGY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=AkaVZS6kOUN4qAPsJgovmKdYoT3CMmCb1Wj3b8DyRjoHaOaQP7Fvsr105So/w5NKl
	 9j350ueBcN+iF1XgkG311GOaNNwndQW86TLSwT748fTv4TcJ9F8bKrRuM7icWKUdLV
	 4bdwCGfobn+rFpzRw4FI83NTzJEwP4rY3AOwmKrY=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/114933] [15 Regression] mcfgthread-1.6.1 typecheck failure:
 error: explicit specializations are not permitted here
Date: Fri, 03 May 2024 09:10:56 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-114933-4-ocj44dktdv@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114933-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114933-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114933

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2022/p2615r1.html

`For consistency extern "C" is given the same restrictions when used direct=
ly.`

So yes.=