From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id B6D58384AB4A; Tue,  7 May 2024 18:45:17 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org B6D58384AB4A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1715107517;
	bh=vAvswqBPUfVrzVZWh+X30NrVKWrk+vszfRLWps66uig=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ZT4GrwZIc2hz9Y/cGF5m6utaaFswhwZdhu+DFNwymVp/Avg8lchmHrs/QMeOO3KZ9
	 OpbOPWm8BfmvINsf5gMMslcrjg6iJfIYterN4zLvj0djT5gMZcFvuL35Wuq2jXUlE4
	 yv5tkRIC2PRSLBMdB0m74kyc214ogkStme1bxdZM=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114952] False positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized
 starting at -O3 in libbpf
Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 18:45:17 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114952-4-1hvy0fNK1e@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114952-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114952-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114952

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note I don't think this is a `False positive` exactly because GCC has no
knowledge that errno could be non-zero after a fail call to open.=