From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7DE5F385ED69; Tue,  7 May 2024 10:28:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7DE5F385ED69
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1715077709;
	bh=TCn2KaqL3muPyvJjopEAQ6j5T90UtpRFjl172KgloP0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=bRQbwDvjuTlnMNy27MSUtkClZTGfTMNeASMu9sRKNaniRpMfZ38JsCjmi0hku7eiO
	 ykWOV/o8Bp4d2GLlawWFsMHk/DLU2LiBo/6VS//gDtztZCJkWjhSTy2m7Cr/kn/kSh
	 y6HHnCK3vLKd2vyATgi4L0waJf4/SGKDoBnjUMQg=
From: "mkretz at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114966] fails to optimize avx2 in-register
 permute written with std::experimental::simd
Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 10:28:29 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mkretz at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114966-4-KmmKymbvj0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114966-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114966-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114966

--- Comment #4 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) <mkretz at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'm fairly sure it's not the same source anymore. I'll try to understand wh=
ere
it goes wrong in the library, because the vector_t{0, data[0], data[1],
data[2]} expression is still optimized as expected.=