From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 4B5AB3858D39; Tue,  7 May 2024 12:45:18 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4B5AB3858D39
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1715085918;
	bh=LaKYJNpd4DmbEUi4JZAmCz6HYL+Lp3CQoILFwebTNXQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=MXeW69r747HiBe6PUA6GBD7GWBef5GPb8vpEVKLn3o2dmnGKGCeR/wPkR44zk7NF5
	 joOpjhLk7phyEpgGEEg4uTYn994BnS/RmGp8hAm+cES1VZj+DVgzTKVWjxUcFEEEXP
	 HqncGRPjdm/8AwCHD6RexfxHgme/Ji3DoqzPV1h8=
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/114968] [14/15 Regression] missing `__thiscall`
 attribute on builtin declaration of `__cxa_thread_atexit()`
Date: Tue, 07 May 2024 12:45:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 14.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-114968-4-i6MXdmIzhP@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-114968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-114968-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114968

--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Oh, the third argument type for __cxa_throw in cp/except.cc probably needs =
the
same, so the target hook likely should be called similarly to the libstdc++
macro for that.=