From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 5773A3858D35; Wed, 8 May 2024 03:44:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5773A3858D35 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1715139875; bh=Wg+p8xMzb6MijPFHRVnouXTF8CGY4549rWqcRMY7Oyc=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dSmHCIGsGiFVZF2t/iyBoZFhFdVRbQLVn9NowAhAFOtpKbwiiAXNZvknCDT3mPMMZ O6t8L6aP6V9ySrstv7cXnRPDKmHscpoXe2rtWzfh2X4AcsmuEViljKOUjSvd4+0i5u ZAK3nI7dpgutTXzj5Jik/3eJ8ngropjeAwBoQ0rI= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/114969] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] Missed optimization: (bool)((std::max((unsigned long long) 0, (unsigned long long) var_0)) | ( var_0 ? 1 : 0)) => (bool) var_0 Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 03:44:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D114969 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=3D111542 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- very similar to PR 111542 .=