[Bug c/114971] New: gcc-14.1.0, ICE in get_alias_set, at alias.cc:954

[Bug c/114971] New: gcc-14.1.0, ICE in get_alias_set, at alias.cc:954

[sezeroz at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114971

            Bug ID: 114971
           Summary: gcc-14.1.0, ICE in get_alias_set, at alias.cc:954
           Product: gcc
           Version: 14.1.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: sezeroz at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 58115
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58115&action=edit
-freport-bug output

Output from -freport-bug attached.

[Bug c/114971] gcc-14.1.0, ICE in get_alias_set, at alias.cc:954

[sezeroz at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114971

--- Comment #1 from Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz at gmail dot com> ---
Created attachment 58116
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58116&action=edit
-freport-bug output from another ICE

Attached a -freport-bug output from another source ICE'ing at the same place

[Bug c/114971] gcc-14.1.0, ICE in get_alias_set, at alias.cc:954

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114971

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
likely a duplicate of PR114931

[Bug c/114971] gcc-14.1.0, ICE in get_alias_set, at alias.cc:954

[sezeroz at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114971

--- Comment #3 from Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz at gmail dot com> ---
Created attachment 58117
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58117&action=edit
output from a third ICE at the same place

[Bug c/114971] gcc-14.1.0, ICE in get_alias_set, at alias.cc:954

[sezeroz at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114971

--- Comment #4 from Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz at gmail dot com> ---
Created attachment 58118
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58118&action=edit
output from a fourth ICE at the same place

[Bug c/114971] gcc-14.1.0, ICE in get_alias_set, at alias.cc:954

[sezeroz at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114971

--- Comment #5 from Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> likely a duplicate of PR114931

I guess -std=gnu23 is the key, then yes, likely a dup.

Waiting for a resolution.

[Bug c/114971] gcc-14.1.0, ICE in get_alias_set, at alias.cc:954

[sjames at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114971

Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |sjames at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Ozkan Sezer from comment #5)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > likely a duplicate of PR114931
> 
> I guess -std=gnu23 is the key, then yes, likely a dup.
> 
> Waiting for a resolution.

Please check if trunk works, as a fix for that PR was committed not long ago.

[Bug c/114971] gcc-14.1.0, ICE in get_alias_set, at alias.cc:954

[sezeroz at gmail dot com]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114971

--- Comment #7 from Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #6)
> Please check if trunk works, as a fix for that PR was committed not long ago.

Confirmed that trunk has it fixed.

Fix hopefully gets backported soon.

[Bug c/114971] gcc-14.1.0, ICE in get_alias_set, at alias.cc:954

[sjames at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114971

Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED

--- Comment #8 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Thanks. It will be.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 114931 ***