From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id DD27D3865479; Fri, 10 May 2024 03:35:02 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DD27D3865479
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1715312102;
	bh=fVn2BxuHgzUh4canJyyxVPllwDc4HIAb5XX72zD/ByU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=AtVGPA18dzYbeamtQIp4+/MiQLAz36h7Lt9WJnweazmiMuzokM5DbAmGsHytZCOw+
	 m/YMQKwdvuxuY5rk6AJcdp+JiKxKk5sZEBifCIruhaoIvi3/kZQQ2AWhsOPxqzVjdW
	 0KSm7hxKjOrTlkC2ksxmOhhUS/0/bajyqVo4TXIQ=
From: "xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/115014] GCC generates incorrect instructions for
 addressing the data segment through EBP register
Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 03:35:01 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-115014-4-LYYeYX6vzT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115014-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115014-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115014

Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Doucha from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > I am not so sure this is wanted. GCC assumes a flat memory system for s=
tack
> > and normal memory accesses .
>=20
> This is certainly not wanted in the most common case where the flat memory
> assumption is correct. But it should be used for compiling embedded binar=
ies
> with -ffreestanding argument.

No, "Freestanding Environment" has a very specific meaning in the C standar=
d.=20
If we must add this it'd be a separate -m{something} argument.=